04 September 2026 · Vol. XXXVIII · № 13.760 Get the letterSearchSaved
THE APEXGASTRONOMY CHRONICLE
Food TradeField & SeaDiningKitchenDrinksWellbeingWorld MapsBest OfRecipesMarkets
LATEST
Reverse Ramen: Frozen Broth Shavings Over Hot NoodlesAmberjack sashimi, ham, figs and myrtle sauceChagee enters matcha scene through 'The Little Prince' collabI tested ginger nut biscuits from Aldi, M&S and moreSumitaba Japanese Kitchen reopens in Taman Desa, showcasing ‘live unagi’ and grilled itemsThe rise of the ‘fridge red’: Three red wines perfect for chilling (from $28)Popular fried chicken restaurant opens new spot in a prime location in CalgaryThe Best Types of Apples for Baking Apple PieSkip happy hour. These cocktail-inspired pizzas bring the bar to your kitchenThe orange juices of New Zealand supermarkets, ranked from worst to bestMake Southern Italy's Unique Iced Coffee With This Special IngredientKing Ranch Chicken
Drinks

What is "Strong" Coffee? It May Depend on Cultural Context

When consumers say they want a “strong” coffee, they may be referring to any number of qualities — bitterness, dark color, roasted aroma or caffeine-linked stimulation — within a broader cultural context, according to new research from a team in Brazil. Published in May in the Journal of Sensory Studies, the qualitativ…

What is "Strong" Coffee? It May Depend on Cultural Context
“Through its scale of production and long-standing traditions, Brazil has helped shape a shared symbolic language around coffee that extends beyond its borders,”

It found that the phrase strong coffee, or “café forte,” carries layered and often contradictory meanings. The study drew on “social representations theory,” a framework for examining how shared cultural ideas shape individual perception. While famous for its vast, world-leading coffee production, Brazil is also the world’s second-largest coffee-consuming country by volume, behind the United States, with growing demand for specialty coffee.

“Through its scale of production and long-standing traditions, Brazil has helped shape a shared symbolic language around coffee that extends beyond its borders,” the study states. “Within the country, coffee is present in 98% of households and consumed in diverse settings, from morning meals to social gatherings.”

The “Strong” Coffee Sensory Cues

In addition to the in-depth in-person interviews, the study involved tasting three filter-brewed coffees — a “specialty” 100% arabica, a “gourmet” 100% arabica and a “traditional” arabica-robusta blend — prepared to standardized recipes.

Bitterness, dark color, roasted aroma and body were the sensory cues consumers most consistently associated with strength. In a sentence-completion task, strong coffee was most often described as dark, bitter, full-bodied, smoky or astringent.

Some people also tied strength to caffeine’s functional effect, describing it as a “pick-me-up” that helps them wake up and focus. Yet the broader pattern was ambivalent. The same qualities that made a coffee feel strong to one person made it feel harsh, burnt or low-quality to another.

Weakness as a Strength? When asked whether they liked strong coffee, 31.5% of participants described it positively, often citing energy, alertness or stimulation.

Another 34.2% said they disliked strong coffee, associating it with excessive bitterness, poor roasting or lower-quality beans. In the guided tasting, specialty coffee was often perceived as “weak” but pleasant, with balance and aroma carrying more weight.

Traditional coffee, by contrast, was most often described as overly strong, heavily roasted and bitter, sometimes to the point that sugar was needed to make it enjoyable. Gourmet coffee fell somewhere in the middle.

In specialty coffee circles, “strength” is often treated as a technical, manageable attribute, tied to brew ratios, extraction metrics or flavor intensity. This study suggests that the term carries emotional, symbolic and habitual meanings that do not line up neatly with specialty industry language.

“Understanding these interpretations is important for sensory science because consumer vocabulary does not always correspond to standardized sensory descriptors, creating potential gaps between technical evaluation and everyday perception,” the authors wrote. “Understanding how consumers interpret expressions such as ‘strong coffee’ is also relevant for the coffee chain as a whole, including producers, roasters, retailers, and foodservice operators, as these meanings influence expectations, preparation practices and product evaluation.”

Funding came from Brazil’s National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and from CAPES. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

All the authors were affiliated with the University of Campinas. Comments?

Questions? News to share?

Contact DCN’s editors here.

Key facts
  • Percentages: 98% · 100% · 31.5% · 34.2%
  • Figures: 98% · 100% · 31.5% · 34.2%

More Drinks